Policy Exchange 1; North London Mosque 0

The think-tank Policy Exchange has won its long-running legal battle with a London mosque over its controversial pamphlet, The Hijacking of British Islam, which alleged extremist influences in a number of British mosques.

Mr Justice Eady struck out the libel action brought by the North London Central Mosque and ordered that the mosque pay PX’s costs – likely to be rather large. The first £75,000 is due within 28 days.

It is a significant victory against Islamists’ use of the libel laws to intimidate and silence those exposing their activities.

One of the mosque’s trustees is Mohammed Sawalha, described by the BBC’s Panorama as a former senior figure in Hamas who “is said to have masterminded much of Hamas’s political and military strategy” from his perch in London. Earlier this year, Mr Sawalha also signed the Istanbul Declaration, which calls for attacks against the allies of Israel, which include the UK; the British Government interpreted it as calling for attacks on British troops.

Policy Exchange says on its website: “The Trustees of Policy Exchange are delighted to report that Mr Justice Eady yesterday struck out the claim brought against us by the North London Central Mosque.

“North London Central Mosque commenced an action against Policy Exchange and Dr Denis MacEoin for libel, following publication of our study “The Hijacking of British Islam” in October 2007.

“Six trustees who had advanced the claim on behalf of the North London Central Mosque were ordered to pay Policy Exchange’s costs of defending this action.

The High Court made a further Order that £75,000 of those costs be paid by North London Central Mosque within 28 days.”

(Declaration of interest: I have contributed to two pamphlets for Policy Exchange, although not on this subject.)

Advertisements

Shirley Porter: remember her?

Listen to Radio 4 at 9pm tonight to relive all your worst fears about Tory London government. It’s Gregory Evans’s play, Shirleymander, described by the BBC as a “tragic comedy” about the gruesome reign of Dame Shirley Porter, former Westminster Council leader, cut-price Thatcher clone and famous gerrymanderer, seller-off of council houses and 5p cemeteries. Sir Simon Milton – now, as Boris Johnson’s chief of staff, the second-most powerful person in town; then, a minor cog in the Porter machine – probably won’t be listening.

It’s based on my ex-BBC colleague and mate Andy Hosken’s terrific book about Shirl, Nothing Like A Dame (worth buying for the title alone.) Hosken blames me for a sudden and rapid slowdown in sales of his more recent work, Ken, a biography of Ken Livingstone – it was selling pretty well until Ken lost the election, he says. So I think I owe him a plug, don’t you?

The Evening Standard: is it still London's paper?

From January, my old newspaper, the Evening Standard, will be more genuinely an evening. It is to drop its 9am edition, using the presses vacated by London Lite to print all its 600,000 copies in the afternoon. I always thought the Standard should focus more on the end of the day. That early edition essentially went to press before anything had happened – but now every Standard reader will get fresher news, and the hacks won’t have to get up at 4am. As well as saving money, there’s a lot to be said for giving people something whose content is completely different from their morning read.

But there are downsides, such as up to 20 job losses. And the move to afternoons can only accelerate one unfortunate side-effect of the Standard’s change to free. It’s in danger of becoming, not London’s newspaper, but central London’s newspaper. I live in Greenwich, only three miles from the printworks, but it’s almost impossible to find the Standard any more – and I miss reading it, as do a lot of my neighbours. Steadfastly ignoring my change of employer, my newsagent, Raj, gently chides me when I go in his shop – he had plenty of customers for the Standard.

Various boring Standard-haters would always claim that no one outside Chelsea read the paper. But in the real world, the sense of loss, as the BBC recently found, seems quite widespread, with a lot of people in places like Walthamstow and Palmers Green who’d been taking it for years deprived overnight. That’s no way to treat your loyal readers. The moneymen say that it costs too much to deliver to far-flung suburbs. But the counter-argument is this. For a paper now entirely dependent on ad revenue, it is crucial to get yourself into the hands of not just any old 600,000 readers – but the right 600,000 readers. Readers who live in London; readers with money to spend; and readers who actually want to read the paper.

What they’re doing at the moment is giving a fair proportion of those 600,000 copies to tourists and visitors; to people who probably won’t be interested in the houses, cars and clothes advertised; and to people who only take it because it is thrust into their hands, people who may glance through it briefly, then throw it away.

I think there’s a lot of demand – and a lot of ad revenue – in places like Greenwich, many of them rather prosperous. They should divert some of those 600,000 copies to us, or even sell it to us while keeping it free in the centre. At the very least, they should make strenuous efforts to make sure that Zones 2-6 know about the excellent (and now also free) full-paper PDF download. I think we’d repay the attention.

Ken Livingstone: An insight from within the bunker

Redmond O’Neill, one of Ken Livingstone’s most important political aides at City Hall during the last mayoralty, died last month, an event which produced many strong and heartfelt tributes from senior figures. Tim O’Toole, for instance, former managing director of the Tube, praised his “kindness, his gentle soul and his rigorous mind.”

A rather different perspective, however, comes from several of the less elevated GLA toilers with whom O’Neill dealt. This no-holds-barred piece by Bob Pitt, another former mayoral staffer, sheds light not just on O’Neill but on one of the broader weaknesses of the Ken administration. Pitt writes:

“I know it’s not done to speak ill of the dead, but in the case of Redmond O’Neill, who played a prominent role in the London mayor’s office during the eight years that Ken Livingstone held power, I feel an exception should be made…

“Having had some experience of working with him in the mayor’s office during 2004-8, I saw another side to O’Neill, namely the abuse and bullying of staff for which he became notorious at City Hall. It was the kind of behaviour you would expect from the worst sort of manager in the worst private sector company. Yet it took place under an administration that was supposed to be pursuing a progressive agenda and the individual responsible for this behaviour claimed to be a socialist…

“This was why many staff at City Hall had mixed feelings about Ken’s defeat. They were sorry for Ken that he lost the election, and understood that it was a big setback for progressive politics in London, but they really didn’t want people like O’Neill coming back for another four years…

“There are not a few PAs, portering staff and other non-political employees who actually find it pleasanter working under Boris Johnson’s administration than under Ken’s. On a one-to-one basis they are at least treated with some basic respect and civility, which is more than they got from O’Neill and those around him.”

Pitt’s (accurate) thesis is that this treatment inspired many GLA staff to help me and others with our journalistic investigations, sorry “witchhunt”, into the Livingstone City Hall; and he makes a broader point about the politics of those around the then Mayor.

O’Neill and most of Ken’s other key people were members of a Trotskyist sect, Socialist Action; and though the GLA’s policies were not Trotskyist, its centralist, controlling methods certainly were. As Pitt says:

“The problem was that O’Neill and other individuals who had spent decades running a small Trotskyist group on that basis suddenly found themselves at the head of a much bigger and broader organisation, where they antagonised and repelled people by importing the arrogant, top-down, authoritarian culture that characterises the internal life of the far-left sect.”

Pitt, a long-time member of the Left who now works for a Labour member of the London Assembly, simply cannot be dismissed as another evil member of the Right-wing lie machine. I agree with (almost) everything he says.

Blogging: Iraq war interrupts normal service

Apologies for the blogging hiatus over the last week – hope any readers of the newspapers, or TV viewers, will understand why. Normal service should resume tomorrow. There’s been enormous interest in my story on the leaked classified Iraq papers, and we are slowly getting some of the documents published in full online. It’s been a big job, though.

The Telegraph has been leaked around 45 classified documents adding up to more than a thousand pages. There are several dozen “post-operational reports,” written by individual commanders and units, and two “overall” reports which pull them – and some other reports we haven’t got – together. There’s a bit of overlap between them, with some of the findings which appear in one report also appearing in others. There are also hundreds of pages of very frank classified transcripts of MoD interviews conducted with senior commanders returning from battle.

It is our wish to place as much of this as possible on the Telegraph website, but the process of checking such a large number of papers – for anything which might compromise our sources, reveal private personal information or compromise national security – is necessarily lengthy.

Our sources have asked that some documents not be published at all, and that others be re-typed by us before publication. Finally, we may withhold some documents, or parts of documents, because they contain material or background for future stories. Therefore, not every document from which we have quoted in the newspaper will be published at this stage.

PS: The admirable Chris Ames, whose Iraq Inquiry Monitor should be essential reading, writes that one of the 45 documents we were passed by our sources has separately appeared on Wikileaks, something I hadn’t spotted. Clearly no other journalist noticed it, either: none of the quotes we used have appeared before, with the exception of a handful which appeared in both our document and two separate, shorter reports with different titles obtained by two colleagues in 2007 and 2009.

Boris Johnson: Goodbye to the Piffle Tower

We already have microseconds, milliseconds, and the interval between the traffic light going green and the bloke behind you honking his horn. Now, however, there is a new yardstick to measure an incredibly brief period of time. Let’s call it the “piffle moment”.

On October 25, older readers may remember, it was reported that Boris Johnson was planning to build a “394-foot structure resembling a cross between a pylon and a Native American totem pole” at the Olympic site. Partly because of its slight similarity to the work of one Gustav Eiffel, and partly because of Boris’s famous “inverted pyramid of piffle” denial of his affair with the journalist Petronella Wyatt, but mostly because it was quite a decent joke, it was swiftly dubbed the Mayor’s “piffle tower.”

Well, all of 17 days later, tucked away unnoticed in a story by my former Standard colleague Katharine Barney about the candidates for Boris’s proposed Olympic edifice, we find the following:

A design for an iron construction that would have been six times taller than the Angel of the North has not made the shortlist of finalists.

The proposed monument featured a translucent structure with viewing decks above the Olympic Park.

The piffle tower, it turns out, is yet another of those wheezes that have poured from Team Johnson, only to last about as long as the edition of the newspaper they appear in. Remember the “living bridge”, a “new Thames crossing for London, packed with shops and flats?” Remember Cycle Fridays, a series of “escorted cycle rides” which served a few dozen people? What do you mean, no?

Some things Boris’s opponents attack as vanity projects don’t really qualify. Growing more food on London rooftops is a nice idea. The new Routemaster will be London’s first green bus, desperately needed in a city whose highly polluting, all-diesel bus fleet lags decades behind other capitals’.

But there are too many silly little initiatives coming out of City Hall. The endless quest to be seen to be doing things is taking time and energy away from actually doing things – and will ultimately also irritate and annoy the voters. New Labour learned that the hard way. Let’s hope Boris doesn’t have to.

Alastair Campbell fails to control the media

A few days late, perhaps – but amply justified by the material – let me draw your attention to a fine confrontation on BBC1’s This Week between one of my favourite London MPs, Diane Abbott, Michael Portillo, and that twinkly old charmer, Alastair Campbell.

The former Chief Persuader produces his usual denials that he abused and bullied people (“balls… absolute bilge”) and is then told by Portillo that he’s personally heard it happen while waiting for a radio interview. Abbott joins in: “You can still see the bruises on them… Your modus operandi was about bullying.” Campbell: “I know you don’t like saying good things about the Labour government.” Abbott: “Oh, here we go.”

It’s really quite funny to see how thin-skinned Campbell is and how riled he gets. Asked later by Abbott whether he’ll be helping in the election campaign, he snaps: “I’ll probably help more than you do, Diane.” Abbot, silkily: “I’m certainly turning people out to vote in my own constituency, many of whom were worried by some aspects of what you represented in the Labour Party.”

Legendary stuff – which Alastair has curiously failed to mention in his equally-legendary blog. Never mind, you can see it here.